China’s Noisy Nuclear Submarines


Date:2013-10-26 Source:fas By:globalmil Viewed:

By Hans M. Kristensen

China’s new Jin-class ballistic missile submarine is noisier than the Russian Delta III-class submarines built more than 30 years ago, according to a report produced by the U.S. Navy’s Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI).

依照美国海军情报办公室(ONI)公布的一份报告,中国新的晋级弹道导弹潜艇噪音超过30年以前俄国建造的“德尔塔” III级潜艇。

The report The People’s Liberation Army Navy: A Modern Navy With Chinese Characteristics, which was first posted on the FAS Secrecy News Blog and has since been removed from the ONI web site [but now back here; thanks Bruce], is to my knowledge the first official description made public of Chinese and Russian modern nuclear submarine noise levels.


Force Level

The report shows that China now has two Jin SSBNs, one of which is based at Hainan Island with the South Sea Fleet, along with two Type 093 Shang-class nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSN). The Jin was first described at Hainan in February 2008 and the two Shangs in September 2008. The second Jin SSBN is based at Jianggezhuang with the North Sea Fleet alongside the old Xia-class SSBN and four Han-class SSNs.



The report confirms the existence of the Type 095, a third-generation SSN intended to follow the Type 093 Shang-class. Five Type 095s are expected from around 2015. The Type-95 is estimated to be noisier than the Russian Akula I SSN built 20 years ago.

报告证实095型攻击核潜艇(SSN)的存在,第三代SSN意图去替代093型商级。五艘095型被期望从2015年左右部署。095型被估计比俄国在20年以前建造的阿库拉 I级SSN噪音更大。

Missile Range

The ONI report states that the JL-2 sea-launched ballistic missile on the Jin SSBNs has a range of ~4,000 nautical miles (~7,400 km) “is capable of reaching the continental United States from Chinese littorals.” Not quite, unless Chinese littorals extend well into the Sea of Japan. Since the continental United States does not include Alaska and Hawaii, a warhead from a 7,400-km range JL-2 would fall into the sea about 800 km from Seattle. A JL-2 carrying penetration aids in addition to a warhead would presumably have a shorter range.



Julang-2 SLBM Range According to ONI
依照ONI报告的JL-2 SLBM射程

Although the ONI report states that the Julang-2 can target the Continental United States, the range estimate it provides is insufficient to reach the lower 48 states or Hawaii.尽管依照ONI报告称JL-2能打击美国大陆,估计它提供的射程是不够到达美国本土或夏威夷。

Alaska would be in range if the JL-2 is launched from the very northern parts of Chinese waters, but Hawaii is out of range unless the missile is launched from a position close to South Korea or Japan. The U.S. Defense Department’s 2009 report to Congress on the Military Power of the People’s Republic of China also shows the range of the JL-2 to be insufficient to target the Continental United States or Hawaii from Chinese waters. The JL-2 instead appears to be a regional weapon with potential mission against Russia and India and U.S. bases in Guam and Japan.


Patrol Levels

The report also states that Chinese submarine patrols have “more than tripled” over the past few years, when compared to the historical levels of the last two decades.



That sounds like a lot, but given that the entire Chinese submarine fleet in those two decades in average conducted fewer than three patrols per year combined, a trippling doesn’t amout to a whole lot for a submarine fleet of 63 submarines. According to data obtained from ONI under FOIA, the patrol number in 2008 was 12.


Since only the most capable of the Chinese attack submarines presumably conduct these patrols away from Chinese waters – and since China has yet to send one of its ballistic missile submarines on patrol – that could mean one or two patrols per year per submarine.



The ONI report concludes that the Jin SSBN with the JL-2 SLBM gives the PLA Navy its first credible second-strike nuclear capability. The authors must mean in principle, because in a war such noisy submarines would presumably be highly vulnerabe to U.S. or Japanese anti-submarine warfare forces. (The noise level of China’s most modern diesel-electric submarines is another matter; ONI says some are comparable to Russian diesel-electric submarines).


ONI报告得出结论晋级SSBN拥有JL-2 SLBM第一次赋予PLA海军可靠的第二次核打击能力。报告作者一定大体而言,因为在战争中如此嘈杂的潜艇据推测对美国或日本反潜战力量来讲是非常脆弱。(中国最大多数的现代化柴电潜艇噪音水平是另外的一个话题;ONI称一些可与俄国柴电潜艇相比较)。

That does raise an interesting question about the Chinese SSBN program: if Chinese leaders are so concerned about the vulnerability of their nuclear deterrent, why base a significant portion of it on a few noisy platforms and send them out to sea where they can be sunk by U.S. attack submarines in a war? And if Chinese planners know that the sea-based deterrent is much more vulnerable than its land-based deterrent, why do they waste money on the SSBN program?


The answer is probably a combination of national prestige and scenarios involving India or Russia that have less capable anti-submarine forces.


    pre[上一篇]:Bluffer’s Guide: Fortress China[C]   next[下一篇]:Estimated Nuclear Weapons Locations 2009

      Winning:Let The Robots Take Care Of It  
          The U.S. Navy has come up with a novel idea for using offensive mobile naval mines and a robotic submarine to plant them. This approach could even operate as an offensive weapon against Chinese submarines seeking to block access to the South... [2021-07-30]
      Taiwan says Chinese fighter jets made record 380 incursions in 2020  
          “The 380 incursions into our southwest ADIZ in 2020 are a lot more frequent than the past,” said defence ministry spokesman Shih Shun-wen.... [2021-01-08]
      German government at odds over armed drones  
          German armed forces have so far only been allowed to use reconnaissance drones as part of military missions in Mali and Afghanistan... [2021-01-06]
      Trump Administration Again Refuses To Disclose Nuclear Weapons Stockpile Size  
          The decision also contradicts the decision in 2018 to declassify the data for 2017, the first year of the Trump administration.... [2020-12-08]